Saturday, April 12, 2008

Exxpose

Environmentalists are furious that strategically donated research money to institutions such as Stanford and Berkeley is giving "Big Oil", in the shape of ExxonMobil and BP, the opportunity to "greenwash" their images in the US.

At Stanford, environmentalists have been concerned about the university's relationship with ExxonMobil since it was announced in 2002 that the company would donate $100m over 10 years to fund research.

http://gcep.stanford.edu/index.html

http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_climate_actions_gcep.aspx

The money from the deal goes to the university's Global Climate and Energy Project, which also includes General Electric, Schlumberger and Toyota as corporate sponsors.

One aspect of the deal that galled opponents is the fact that the oil company reserves five-year, exclusive rights to any discoveries resulting from the research it funds. Another was the fact that the oil company also receives - for what environmentalists regard as a pittance - the ability to trade off the independent reputation of Stanford to promote itself as environmentally responsible - ExxonMobil recently announced 2007 profits in excess of $40bn, the most ever recorded by a single company, and has reportedly funded the efforts of global warming sceptics in the media.

Exxon Mobil earned more than $1,287 of profit for every second of 2007.

The company's renewable research investment of a mere $100m over a spans of ten years pales in comparison to the billions spent by the company each year scouting out new oil drilling locations.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/business/01cnd-exxon.html

In 2005, a environmental coalition was formed calling for a boycott of the company's products and stocks and a reform of Exxon's corporate behavior. The campaign is called ExxposeExxon and features campaigners from 12 of America's largest public interest/environmental groups. "For years, ExxonMobil has intentionally put its own profits above a clean environment and the health of America’s families. As a result, we are asking all Americans not to accept a new job at ExxonMobil, invest in the company, or to buy ExxonMobil’s gas and products," stated the ExxposeExxon coalition in a letter sent to ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond.

http://www.climateark.org/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=44179&keybold=GCEP

I personally agree with the environmentalists on this concern. It appears that Exxon is more interested in the way the investment in the GCEP can improve their scarred image as opposed to improving the scarred environment.

1 comment:

Will said...

I agree that "Big Oil" is only concerned with maintaining an environmental image, and have no intention of preserving the environment. I have noticed alot of BP Commercials pronouncing their care for the environment with their symbol of a green, living sunflower (or whatever it is), while at the same time they were just recently responsible for our last largest oil disaster in Alaska where oil pipes are breaking due to Corperate leaders ignoring service advisorys initiated by on-site technicians. Although, I dont agree with donation stipulations between "Big Oil" and Stanford, I dont know who to critisize more. I wouldn't expect anything less from "Big Oil", and even if they hadn't established this relationship with Stanford, they would still do something similiar with someone else. I understand Stanford may be in a situation where they will take what they can get regardless of who it comes from, but Im disappointed that they would allow them 5 year exclusive rights and still call it a "donation." Sounds more like a Investment.